The Bishops of Gaul and chronological tables.
512. The Bishops of Gaul and the expulsion of Quintianus from
Rodez.
Gregory had mentioned a few Bishops and holy men at the time of
Clovis and so they are as much wrapped up in the chronology as Clovis
is. As noted above in the introduction, Wood had examined the life
of Quintianus in some depth in his 1998 work, but had thought Gregory
was wrong for placing the paragraph about Quintianus before Vouillé,
even though Gregory was clearly summarising his whole life.
Quintianus
was a Bishop of Rodez in southern Gaul, that would have been in
Visigothic hands in 506. He had attended the Council of Agde in 506.
Gregory relates that he had sympathies for the Franks and was
eventually expelled from Rodez and fled to Clermont where he was made
Bishop after Apollinaris died1.
Gregory claims that Quintianus was fond of Clovis' Son Theuderic and
it was for this reason that he favoured them and places his death in
5212.
As
briefly discussed earlier, Wood, suggested it was wrong for Gregory
to place this paragraph in around 506, which led to disparaging
comments about Gregory, who did place Vouille in 507 in CC511. But in CC518, in the interpolated chronology Vouillé was placed
in 513.This episode was then placed immediately before it in 512.
CC511 would place
Quintianus taking up the Bishopric of Clermont in 516 due to
Gregory's formula of Eufrasius dying four years after
Clovis, after which
Quintian served. But what if
this is the interpolator's distorted chronology where he placed the
death of Clovis in 518. Hence the year he meant was 521. Which is
actually the correct time for these events. We must therefore remove
516 as the date for these events. Wood had already seen these
problems commenting, “the events and chronology however
are in conflict”3
We have evidence that the expulsion was long after 508 as Quintianus
of Rodez attended the Council of Orleans in 511. He therefore cannot
have been expelled before this time.
One
final piece of evidence for Quintianus. He was invited by Avitus to
the Burgundian Synod of Epaon in 517. He was not yet Bishop of
Clermont (until 521) and this is perhaps why he was invited, as he
used to be Bishop of Rodez, which was close to the Burgundian border,
and which may have been in Burgundian episcopal territory at some
point in the early sixth century. In CC511 he
would already be, in 517, Bishop of Clermont. This caused scholars
confusion, as a Bishop of Clermont should not be invited to a
Burgundian Synod. Reasons therefore were put forward to discredit the
veracity of Avitus' letter.
The sequence of events is therefore as follows. In 507 the Franks
defeated the Visigoths at Vouillé. Gregory mentions the episode of
the abbot Maxentius at this point who had faced some Visigothic
soldiers. As Gregory continued; Clovis' son Theuderic, after the
battle of Vouillé, was sent to Albi, Rodez and Clermont to bring
them under Frankish rule. This was obviously when Quintianus would
have met the young Theuderic and become his friend and religious
mentor. After a year or two of Frankish rule though, in 509,
Theoderic sent his Goths to take back Visigothic possessions won by
Clovis and the Burgundians. Rodez now passed into
Ostrogothic hands. Quintianus being sympathetic to the Franks and
friendly with Theuderic, a year or so later, attended the Council of
Orleans in 511, upsetting his Gallo Gothic population. He was
probably expelled then, in around 512. From there he went to Clermont
where Eufrasius was Bishop, and after he died in 521 there was an
election for the Bishopric. The Franks, wanting to reward Quintianus
for his loyalty to their cause, favoured his appointment immediately,
but the relatives of Apollinaris, son of the great Sidonius caused a
stir as they favoured him. According to Gregory, Apollinaris bribed
King Theuderic with many presents and he was then awarded the
Bishopric, but he died just four months later. Quintianus then became
Bishop himself, appointed by Theuderic. The table below shows the
Bishops of Tours and Clermont during our period.
Bishops of Tours
|
Greg. - Tours Episcopates
|
Bishops of Clermont
|
||
491-497
|
Volusianus
|
7 years 2 months
|
Aprunculus
|
Died 497
|
497-507
|
Verus
|
11 years
|
Eufrasius
|
497 - 521
|
507-518
|
Licinius
|
12 years
|
||
518-519
|
Difinius
|
10 months
|
Apollinaris
|
521 4 months
|
519-522
|
Ommatius
|
4.5 years
|
Quintianus
|
521-525
|
522-523
|
Leo
|
6 months
|
Next we may be able to work out the Episcopate of Remigius of Reims. Remigius wrote a letter to several Bishops, that mention Clovis in the past tense, and he also mentioned that he had been a bishop for 53 years. If we could identify one or all of these Bishops we could pin down when Remigius' episcopate began and when this letter was written. In CC511 it is generally placed in 513 as it is thought Remigius began his episcopate around 460. Here is part of the letter :
Bishop Remegius to the truly holy and very blessed in Christ by the merits
of our lords brothers Heraclius (Paris), Leoni (Coutances) and Theodosius (Auxerre)
“ As for Claudius, who you write, is not a presbyter, I only asked you to reveal the cause of your indignation. I do not deny that he has sinned gravely but you should have respected my age, if not my merits..For fifty-three years I have been a Bishop and no one has addressed me so impudently. You say: “It would be better had you not been born...” I made Claudius a presbyter, not corrupted by gold but on the testimony of the very excellent king (Clovis), who not only strongly asserted but defended the Catholic faith. You write : “What he ordered was not canonical..” The ruler of the provinces, the guardian of the fatherland, the conqueror of nations enjoined this! ...You write that I am in my Jubilee years, ridiculing, rather than celebrating out of affection, someone whom you neither spare nor respect, having dishonestly broken the bond of love.” 4
Heraclius
here, is presumed to be the Bishop of Paris whose obit is placed
around 516, but is generally unknown.
Theodosius
of Auxerre also attended the first council of Orleans in 511, his
obit again is placed around 516 but is unknown.5
Bishop Leoni (also known as Leo) however has been a bit of a mystery
but there were two attendees at the Council of Orleans who are
possibles. Leontianus of Coutances and Leontius of Eauze, but as
Eauze is in southern Gaul and the other churches northern then
Leontianus of Coutances appears to be our man. He apparently died in
around 512-13, so a date for the letter of 512-513 agrees with the
current understanding of the episcopate of Remigius, meaning it started probably in around 459-460.
Gregory starts off book three of his histories in the year 516, after
Gundobad had passed. He also mentions that Clovis' daughter was
married to Amalaric, the Visigothic King, who were both around
sixteen years of age by now. He also mentions the passing of Licinius
of Tours in 419 and Difinius in 520. Gregory then mentions Quintianus
being made Bishop of Clermont after Apollinaris in 521. The Danes at
this same time plundered the coast of Clovis' son Theuderic's
kingdom, which his son Theudebert was able to repel.
Suggested Chronology
- EventPlaceYearBirth of ChildericBelgica II435Childeric KingBelgica II452Childeric Federate leaderBegica II457Childeric ParisParis466-476Childeric Marries BasinaParis470?Birth of ClovisParis473Childeric in Noricum - AlamanniNoricum476-480Death of ChildericTornai482Accession of ClovisTornai488Defeat of SyagriusSoissons491Marriage to ClotildaSoissons492Start of First Visigoth war.LugdunensisSaintes493-495Treaty with ArmoricansNantes495Baptism of ClovisReims496Death of Albofled his sisterParis?497First Visigothic war continuesBordeaux498Defeat of ThuringiansGermania II499Burgundian civil warBurgundy500 - 502Meeting with AlaricTours503Battle of TolbiacGermania II506Battle of Vouillé, Poitiers, Albi, Rodez, Clermont.Poitiers507Toulouse, Anguoeleme Honorary ConsulshipTours508Paris CapitalParis508Loss of southern Gaul.Southern Gaul509-510Rex SalicaParis510Council of OrleansOrleans511Death of ClovisParis511Abbot Maxentius, QuintianusRodez /Clermont512
In part nine I will come to conclusions about Clovis himself, leaning heavily in support of Daley's revisionist approach.
1Gregory.
Histories II.36
2Gregory.
Histories III.2
3Ibid
Wood 1998 p.256.
4Full
letter in appendix.
5Bunson,
M, M, S.Our Sunday Visitor's Encyclopedia of Saints Our Sunday
Visitor Inc.,U.S.; Revised edition,2003.
No comments:
Post a Comment